Review Procedure

The International Journal of Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation (IJMSI) follows a rigorous peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality research that makes meaningful contributions across various scientific disciplines. Peer review, where experts assess the validity and quality of manuscripts, is essential to our scholarly publishing process.

Upon receiving a manuscript, the editorial team conducts a thorough evaluation based on criteria such as authenticity, completeness, ethical approval, proper formatting, originality, innovation, relevance, adherence to scientific writing conventions, and language proficiency. Manuscripts meeting these criteria are considered for further review, while those not meeting the standards may be rejected.

The International Journal of Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation (IJMSI) utilizes a double-blind peer review system, where both authors and reviewers remain anonymous. Reviewers evaluate manuscripts on originality, significance, methodology, analysis, clarity, and relevance to the multidisciplinary science fields. Their confidential feedback is shared with authors, enabling constructive dialogue and revisions.

Once reviews are completed, the Editor(s)-in-Chief assess the manuscript’s suitability for publication, taking reviewer feedback into consideration. Accepted manuscripts are provided with formatting guidelines for final submission, while those requiring revisions must address the comments and meet formatting requirements before resubmission. Rejected manuscripts conclude the review process.

At the International Journal of Multidisciplinary Science and Innovation (IJMSI), the peer review system is integral to maintaining academic excellence and advancing knowledge across a wide range of scientific areas.